McMaster University

McMaster University

Navigation vs. conventional high tibial osteotomy: systematic review

We are pleased to share with you the most recent publication from the MacOrtho team titled “Navigation vs. conventional high tibial osteotomy: systematic review.”

Find the abstract below and click here to access the article.

Hasan KA, De Sa D, Khan M, Pazionis T, Zalzal P. Navigation vs. conventional high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. OA Orthopaedics. 2013 Aug; 1(2):14.

Abstract

One major use for high tibial osteotomy (HTO) aims at improving alignment in the symptomatic, varus malaligned, medial compartment osteoartritic knee. The importance of achieving correct alignment is obvious upon considering the increased potential for significant complications with over- or under-correction in any plane. This systematic review searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to compare the short-term clinical and radiological outcomes between patients undergoing either conventional or navigated HTO. We retrieved 52 articles which ultimately resulted in nine eligible studies for inclusion. Though heterogeneity prevented statistical analysis, only one study failed to suggest superiority of navigation over conventional techniques. We conclude that navigated high tibial osteotomy improves accuracy over conventional techniques, though the current best evidence presented herein must be advanced by higher quality studies.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Level Double-A conformance, W3C WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0