McMaster University

McMaster University

Publication Rates of Paper Presentations at the AANA Meeting 2006-2010

We are pleased to share with you a recent publication in The Journal of Interpersonal Violence. This publication is entitled "Knowledge Dissemination of Intimate Partner Violence Intervention Studies Measured Using Alternative Metrics: Results From a Scoping Review".

Please find access to the full-version of the article click here.

Kay J, Memon M, de SA D, Duong A, Simunovic N, Ayeni OR.. Does the Level of Evidence of Paper Presentations at the Arthroscopy Association of North America Annual Meeting From 2006-2010 Correlate With the 5-Year Publication Rate or the Impact Factor of the Publishing Journal? DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.032. [Epub ahead of print]

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of paper (podium) presentations at the 2006-2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA) annual scientific meetings that were ultimately published in a peer-reviewed journal. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate whether the level of evidence correlated with the publication rate of these presentations or the impact factor (IF) of the publishing journal.

Methods
Paper presentations from the 2006-2010 AANA annual meetings were included for evaluation. Clinical studies were graded for quality using the level of evidence by 2 independent reviewers. A comprehensive strategy was used to search the databases PubMed, Medline, and Embase for publications in scientific journals that corresponded to the presentations and were published within 5 years of the presentation date.

Results
Three hundred twenty-eight presentations were evaluated. Overall, 179 peer-reviewed publications corresponding to particular meeting presentations were identified, for a 5-year publication rate of 55%. There was no correlation between the publication rate and the level of evidence (P = .836), the type of study (P = .628), or the joint of focus (P = .07) of the presentations. The mean IF of journals that published Level I studies (4.8 [standard error, 2.3]) was significantly higher than the mean IF of journals that published Level II, III, or IV studies (2.58 [standard error, 0.10]) (P = .017).

Conclusions
Between 2006 and 2010, presentations of the highest level of evidence at AANA meetings were subsequently published at a similar rate to presentations of lower levels of evidence, albeit in journals with higher IFs.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Level Double-A conformance, W3C WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0